SCIENTIFIC HUB

Follow the evidence.

SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE · MED

Toward a Multi-Modal Brain-Body Assessment in Parkinson's Disease: A Systematic Review in fNIRS.

IEEE J Biomed Health Inform · 2023-10-05

DOI: 10.1109/jbhi.2023.3308901PMID: 37639416

Check source for accessSystematic Review; Journal ArticleOriginal source ↗

Research overview

The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by

Parkinson's disease (PD) causes impairments in cortical structures leading to motor and cognitive symptoms. While common disease management and treatment strategies mainly depend on the subjective assessment of clinical scales and patients' diaries, research in recent years has focused on advances in automatic and objective tools to help with diagnosing PD and determining its severity. Due to the link between brain structure deficits and physical symptoms in PD, objective brain activity and body motion assessment of patients have been studied in the literature. This study aimed to explore the relationship between brain activity and body motion measures of people with PD to look at the feasibility of diagnosis or assessment of PD using these measures. In this study, we summarised the findings of 24 selected papers from the complete literature review using the Scopus database. Selected studies used both brain activity recording using functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) and motion assessment using sensors for people with PD in their experiments. Results include 1) the most common study protocol is a combination of single tasks. 2) Prefrontal cortex is mostly studied region of interest in the literature. 3) Oxygenated haemoglobin (HbO 2) concentration is the predominant metric utilised in fNIRS, compared to deoxygenated haemoglobin (HHb). 4) Motion assessment in people with PD is mostly done with inertial measurement units (IMUs) and electronic walkway. 5) The relationship between brain activity and body motion measures is an important factor that has been neglected in the literature.

Scientific assessment

01

Research question

Assess the question within the original study’s scope.

02

Methods & sample

Check the source article for study design and sample details.

03

Key findings

An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.

04

Limitations

Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.

Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.