SCIENTIFIC HUB

Follow the evidence.

SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE · MED

Association Between SGLT2 Inhibitors and Risk of Dementia and Parkinson's Disease: A Meta-Analysis of 12 Randomized Controlled Trials.

Am J Med · 2024-07-06

DOI: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2024.06.030PMID: 38977148

Check source for accessMeta-Analysis; Journal ArticleOriginal source ↗

Research overview

The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by

BackgroundSodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) have been shown to reduce the risk of hospitalizations from heart failure and cardiovascular mortality. However, SGLT2i therapy's potential effects on the risks of dementia and Parkinson's disease are not well established, with conflicting results based on observational studies. Hence, we sought to evaluate the association between SGLT2i and the risk of dementia and Parkinson's disease in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus, heart failure, or chronic kidney disease.MethodsWe performed a systematic literature search on PubMed, and Clinicaltrial.gov for relevant randomized controlled trials from inception until March 2024 without any language restrictions. Odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were pooled using a random-effect model.ResultsA total of 12 randomized controlled trials with 74,442 patients (40,784 in the SGLT2i group and 33,658 in the control group) were included in the analysis. The mean age of patients in SGLT2i and control was 65.3 and 65.2 years, respectively. Pooled analysis showed that there is no significant association between SGLT2i use and the risk of dementia (OR 1.37; 95% CI, 0.70-2.69; P = .36), dementia Alzheimer's type (OR 1.99; 95% CI, 0.59-6.71; P = .27), vascular dementia (OR 0.40; 95% CI, 0.09-1.85; P = .24), and Parkinson's disease (OR 0.63; 95% CI, 0.25-1.61; P = .33) when compared with the control groups.ConclusionOur study suggests that there is no significant association between SGLT2i use and the risk of dementia, its subtypes, and Parkinson's disease when compared with the control groups.

Scientific assessment

01

Research question

Assess the question within the original study’s scope.

02

Methods & sample

Check the source article for study design and sample details.

03

Key findings

An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.

04

Limitations

Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.

Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.