SCIENTIFIC HUB

Follow the evidence.

SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE · MED

Genetic architecture of epigenetic cortical clock age in brain tissue from older individuals: alterations in <i>CD46</i> and other loci.

Epigenetics · 2024-08-22

DOI: 10.1080/15592294.2024.2392050PMID: 39169872

Open accessMeta-Analysis; research-article; Journal ArticleOriginal source ↗

Research overview

The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by

The cortical epigenetic clock was developed in brain tissue as a biomarker of brain aging. As one way to identify mechanisms underlying aging, we conducted a GWAS of cortical age. We leveraged postmortem cortex tissue and genotyping array data from 694 participants of the Rush Memory and Aging Project and Religious Orders Study (ROSMAP; 11000,000 SNPs), and meta-analysed ROSMAP with 522 participants of Brains for Dementia Research (5,000,000 overlapping SNPs). We confirmed results using eQTL (cortical bulk and single nucleus gene expression), cortical protein levels (ROSMAP), and phenome-wide association studies (clinical/neuropathologic phenotypes, ROSMAP). In the meta-analysis, the strongest association was rs4244620 (p = 1.29 × 10-7), which also exhibited FDR-significant cis-eQTL effects for CD46 in bulk and single nucleus (microglia, astrocyte, oligodendrocyte, neuron) cortical gene expression. Additionally, rs4244620 was nominally associated with lower cognition, faster slopes of cognitive decline, and greater Parkinsonian signs (n ~ 1700 ROSMAP with SNP/phenotypic data; all p ≤ 0.04). In ROSMAP alone, the top SNP was rs4721030 (p = 8.64 × 10-8) annotated to TMEM106B and THSD7A. Further, in ROSMAP (n = 849), TMEM106B and THSD7A protein levels in cortex were related to many phenotypes, including greater AD pathology and lower cognition (all p ≤ 0.0007). Overall, we identified converging evidence of CD46 and possibly TMEM106B/THSD7A for potential roles in cortical epigenetic clock age.

Scientific assessment

01

Research question

Assess the question within the original study’s scope.

02

Methods & sample

Check the source article for study design and sample details.

03

Key findings

An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.

04

Limitations

Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.

Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.