SCIENTIFIC HUB

Follow the evidence.

SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE · MED

Chaperone-mediated autophagy as a modulator of aging and longevity.

Front Aging · 2024-12-02

DOI: 10.3389/fragi.2024.1509400PMID: 39687864

Open accessreview-article; Review; Journal ArticleOriginal source ↗

Research overview

The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by

Chaperone-mediated autophagy (CMA) is the lysosomal degradation of individually selected proteins, independent of vesicle fusion. CMA is a central part of the proteostasis network in vertebrate cells. However, CMA is also a negative regulator of anabolism, and it degrades enzymes required for glycolysis, de novo lipogenesis, and translation at the cytoplasmic ribosome. Recently, CMA has gained attention as a possible modulator of rodent aging. Two mechanistic models have been proposed to explain the relationship between CMA and aging in mice. Both of these models are backed by experimental data, and they are not mutually exclusionary. Model 1, the "Longevity Model," states that lifespan-extending interventions that decrease signaling through the INS/IGF1 signaling axis also increase CMA, which degrades (and thereby reduces the abundance of) several proteins that negatively regulate vertebrate lifespan, such as MYC, NLRP3, ACLY, and ACSS2. Therefore, enhanced CMA, in early and midlife, is hypothesized to slow the aging process. Model 2, the "Aging Model," states that changes in lysosomal membrane dynamics with age lead to age-related losses in the essential CMA component LAMP2A, which in turn reduces CMA, contributes to age-related proteostasis collapse, and leads to overaccumulation of proteins that contribute to age-related diseases, such as Alzheimer's disease, Parkinson's disease, cancer, atherosclerosis, and sterile inflammation. The objective of this review paper is to comprehensively describe the data in support of both of these explanatory models, and to discuss the strengths and limitations of each.

Scientific assessment

01

Research question

Assess the question within the original study’s scope.

02

Methods & sample

Check the source article for study design and sample details.

03

Key findings

An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.

04

Limitations

Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.

Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.