SCIENTIFIC HUB

Follow the evidence.

SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE · MED

Studying Rare Movement Disorders: From Whole-Exome Sequencing to New Diagnostic and Therapeutic Approaches in a Modern Genetic Clinic.

Biomedicines · 2024-11-23

DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines12122673PMID: 39767580

Open accessresearch-article; Journal ArticleOriginal source ↗

Research overview

The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by

Background: Rare movement disorders often have a genetic etiology. New technological advances have increased the odds of achieving genetic diagnoses: next-generation sequencing (NGS) (whole-exome sequencing-WES; whole-genome sequencing-WGS) and long-read sequencing (LRS). In 2017, we launched a WES program for patients with rare movement disorders of suspected genetic etiology. We aim to describe the accumulated experience of a modern movement disorder genetic clinic, highlighting how different available genetic tests might be prioritized according to the clinical phenotype and pattern of inheritance. Methods: Participants were studied through WES analysis. Descriptive statistics, including the mean, standard deviation, counts, and percentages, were used to summarize demographic and clinical characteristics in all subjects and with each type of result [pathogenic or likely pathogenic, variants of uncertain significance (VUS), negative]. Results: We studied 88 patients (93.2% Caucasian, 5.72% African American, and 1.08% Hispanic or Latino). After excluding six family members from four index participants, the diagnostic yield of WES reached 27% (22/82 probands). The age at onset was significantly lower in patients with pathogenic/likely pathogenic variants. The most common clinical phenotypes were ataxia and parkinsonism. Dystonia, ataxia, leukoencephalopathy, and parkinsonism were associated with most genetic diagnoses. Conclusions: We propose a comprehensive protocol with decision tree testing for WGS and LRS, a return of results, and a re-analysis of inconclusive genetic data to increase the diagnostic yield of patients with rare neurogenetic disorders.

Scientific assessment

01

Research question

Assess the question within the original study’s scope.

02

Methods & sample

Check the source article for study design and sample details.

03

Key findings

An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.

04

Limitations

Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.

Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.