SCIENTIFIC HUB

Follow the evidence.

SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE · MED

Safety of Immersive Virtual Reality for the Management of Parkinson's Disease.

Sensors (Basel) · 2024-12-22

DOI: 10.3390/s24248188PMID: 39771922

Open accessother; Randomized Controlled Trial; Journal ArticleOriginal source ↗

Research overview

The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by

Virtual reality (VR) has been used in research and clinical practice in the management of Parkinson's disease (PD), potentially enhancing physiotherapy. Adverse events (AEs) associated with VR applications in PD have been poorly explored. We conducted a randomized controlled trial to compare two 12-week interventions using physiotherapy and immersive VR, and analyzed the frequency and type of AEs occurring in 30 people with PD. We reported 144 AEs (8.4% of the sessions), predominantly classified as mild and unrelated to the interventions. Two were serious AEs, one leading to study discontinuation. Notably, discomfort/pain, motor fluctuations, and falls were the most frequently reported, accounting for 63% of the total AEs. Five falls were definitely associated with the 'sense of presence' provided by the fully immersive VR system, which underscores the necessity for careful game selection when designing interventions for PD. Motor fluctuations may have been associated with various factors, which merit further investigation. We also explored the role of SSQ as a measure of cybersickness in PD. In conclusion, it is important to closely monitor and characterize AEs to ensure safety and efficacy in clinical practice as AEs may be more common than previously recognized in VR interventions in PD.

Scientific assessment

01

Research question

Assess the question within the original study’s scope.

02

Methods & sample

Check the source article for study design and sample details.

03

Key findings

An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.

04

Limitations

Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.

Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.