NeuralCipher Research overview
The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by
BackgroundAugmented Reality (AR) and Mixed Reality (MR) are emerging technologies with notable potential for motor rehabilitation. Given the novelty and breadth of this field, this scoping review aims to identify how and to what extent AR and MR technologies are used in motor rehabilitation.MethodsWe conducted a search in Scopus and PubMed (2010-2024), following PRISMA-ScR guidelines. In the analysis, we focused on four key aspects: (I) the AR/MR display technologies, (II) the sensors used to collect data to generate the augmented information, (III) the pathologies addressed, and (IV) the assessment of usability and acceptability.ResultsAmong 105 selected studies, 58% developed new prototypes, while 42% tested existing systems. Head-mounted displays were the most common device (56.2%), followed by monitors (34.3%) and video projectors (14.3%). The most commonly used sensors were RGB-D cameras (31.4%), sensors for localization and mapping (33.3%), normal cameras (17.1%), and electromyography sensors (14.3%). Regarding the target pathology, 34.2% of studies did not focus on a specific pathology, 26.7% were on stroke, 10.5% on limb loss, and 9.5% on Parkinson's disease. Over half (51.4%) of the studies investigated usability and acceptance.ConclusionsAR/MR technologies hold promise for motor rehabilitation, but limited comparative studies and long-term investigations currently hinder a clear understanding of their benefits.
Scientific assessment
Research question
Assess the question within the original study’s scope.
Methods & sample
Check the source article for study design and sample details.
Key findings
An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.
Limitations
Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.
Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.