SCIENTIFIC HUB

Follow the evidence.

SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE · MED

Alpha-synuclein misfolding as fluid biomarker for Parkinson's disease measured with the iRS platform.

EMBO Mol Med · 2025-04-25

DOI: 10.1038/s44321-025-00229-zPMID: 40281305

Open accessresearch-article; Journal ArticleOriginal source ↗

Research overview

The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by

Misfolding and aggregation of alpha-synuclein (αSyn) play a key role in the pathophysiology of Parkinson's disease (PD). Despite considerable advances in diagnostics, an early and differential diagnosis of PD still represents a major challenge. We innovated the immuno-infrared sensor (iRS) platform for measuring αSyn misfolding. We analyzed cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) from two cohorts comprising PD cases, atypical Parkinsonian disorders, and disease controls. We obtained an AUC of 0.90 (n = 134, 95% CI 0.85-0.96) for separating PD/MSA from controls by determination of the αSyn misfolding by iRS. Using two thresholds divided individuals as unaffected/affected by misfolding with an intermediate area in between. Comparing the affected/unaffected cases, controls versus PD/MSA cases were classified with 97% sensitivity and 92% specificity. The spectral data revealed misfolding from an α-helical/random-coil αSyn in controls to β-sheet enriched αSyn in PD and MSA cases. Moreover, a first subgroup analysis implied the potential for patient stratification in clinically overlapping cases. The iRS, directly measuring all αSyn conformers, is complementary to the αSyn seed-amplification assays (SAAs), which however only amplify seeding competent conformers.

Scientific assessment

01

Research question

Assess the question within the original study’s scope.

02

Methods & sample

Check the source article for study design and sample details.

03

Key findings

An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.

04

Limitations

Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.

Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.