Research overview
The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by
IntroductionParkinson's disease (PD) is a chronic, progressive neurodegenerative disorder that primarily affects motor functions. Recently, a diffusion tensor imaging technique called DTI along the perivascular space (DTI-ALPS) has gained attention as a noninvasive biomarker for glymphatic function. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the potential and implications of the DTI-ALPS index for diagnosing PD.MethodsThis study followed the PRISMA 2020 statement. Eligible cohort and cross-sectional studies measured the ALPS index in PD patients versus non-PD participants. Web of Science, Medline, Scopus, Embase, Cochrane, PROSPERO, and ICTRP databases were explored until November 14, 2024. Two researchers independently screened studies, extracted data, and assessed the risk of bias using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS). The meta-analysis used a random effects model (REM), assessing heterogeneity (I2, Q-test) and publication bias (Egger's test, trim&fill plot). The certainty of the evidence was evaluated using the GRADE approach.ResultsThis meta-analysis of 11 studies, involving 1462 patients (855 PD, 607 non-PD of both genders), yielded significant findings. The overall ALPS index differed substantially between PD and non-PD groups (SMD: -0.61, 95% CI: -0.72, -0.50, p 2: 89.81, p 2 = 87.37, p ConclusionThese findings highlight the potential of DTI-ALPS as a noninvasive biomarker for PD diagnosis and progression monitoring. Further studies are warranted to explore its applicability in differentiating PD from other neurodegenerative disorders.
Scientific assessment
Research question
Assess the question within the original study’s scope.
Methods & sample
Check the source article for study design and sample details.
Key findings
An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.
Limitations
Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.
Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.