SCIENTIFIC HUB

Follow the evidence.

SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE · MED

Functional and Clinical Relevance of the Crosstalk between the Glymphatic System and the Lymphatic System.

Curr Neuropharmacol · 2025-01-01

DOI: 10.2174/011570159x359861250224051857PMID: 40464180

Open accessreview-article; Review; Journal ArticleOriginal source ↗

Research overview

The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by

In this review, we describe the concept of the glymphatic system as a glial-dependent clearance pathway in the brain. The hypothesis of the glymphatic system function suggests that dural lymphatic vessels absorb the cerebrospinal fluid and brain interstitial fluid via the glymphatic system and transport fluid into deep cervical lymph nodes. We present the accumulated data of various studies confirming the possible interconnection among the brain interstitial fluid, cerebrospinal fluid, and the glymphatic system. Anatomical features are discussed here together with a possible variety of glymphatic system functions, including the removal of waste products, transport of substances, and immune function. The glymphatic system is hypothesized to be involved in pathogenesis of many diseases, including Alzheimer's disease, stroke, and Parkinson's disease. We also discuss the role of the glymphatic system in pathophysiology and the complications of brain tumors. Meningeal lymphatics is thoroughly analyzed as well. Finally, we propose new treatment approaches to brain tumors, Parkinson's disease, and stroke using cervical lymph nodes and backward fluid flow in the meningeal lymphatic vessels.

Scientific assessment

01

Research question

Assess the question within the original study’s scope.

02

Methods & sample

Check the source article for study design and sample details.

03

Key findings

An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.

04

Limitations

Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.

Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.