SCIENTIFIC HUB

Follow the evidence.

SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE · MED

Effect of vitamin D supplementation on motor symptoms in Parkinson's disease: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Front Nutr · 2025-06-09

DOI: 10.3389/fnut.2025.1500875PMID: 40551732

Open accessSystematic Review; systematic-review; Journal ArticleOriginal source ↗

Research overview

The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by

IntroductionLower serum vitamin D levels may associate with higher motor symptom severity in Parkinson's disease (PD). This study aimed to test the efficacy of supplemental vitamin D on ameliorating motor symptoms in PD, which is the most comprehensive study to assess the relationship between vitamin D supplementation and PD motor symptoms to date.MethodsAn electronic literature search supplemented by hand searching up to Sep 2024 identified 8 randomized controlled trials involving 646 cases of PD. Weighted mean difference (WMD) and 95% confidence interval (CI) of PD were assessed through pooling the collected data from eligible studies using Stata software.ResultsThe results indicated that supplemental vitamin D did not reduce the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale part III score (WMD=-0.56, 95% CI=[-2.34, 1.23]), 10/8 m walk test time (WMD=0.59, 95% CI=[-0.46, 1.64]) and timed up and go (TUG) test time (WMD=-0.57, 95% CI=[-1.45, 0.31]). A statistically significant benefit of supplemental vitamin D was observed on 6-Minute walking test distance (WMD=24.85, 95% CI=[6.54, 43.16]).DiscussionThis meta-analysis suggested that supplemental vitamin D may extend 6-Minute walking test distance, improve partial motor symptoms. Vitamin D supplementation may play an active inhibitory role in the mechanisms of the development of PD.

Scientific assessment

01

Research question

Assess the question within the original study’s scope.

02

Methods & sample

Check the source article for study design and sample details.

03

Key findings

An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.

04

Limitations

Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.

Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.