SCIENTIFIC HUB

Follow the evidence.

SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE · MED

Common SNCA Genetic Variants and Parkinson's Disease Risk: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Int J Mol Sci · 2025-06-23

DOI: 10.3390/ijms26136001PMID: 40649779

Open accessMeta-Analysis; Systematic Review; review-article; Journal ArticleOriginal source ↗

Research overview

The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by

The SNCA gene, encoding alpha-synuclein, is implicated in the pathogenesis of Parkinson's disease (PD), with several single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) linked to increased risk. This study systematically evaluated the association between common SNCA polymorphisms and PD through a meta-analysis of cohort and case-control studies published before 20 November 2023. Eligible studies were identified via comprehensive searches of PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science, and pooled odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals were calculated under allelic, dominant, and recessive models. Heterogeneity and publication bias were assessed, and subgroup and sensitivity analyses were performed. Twenty-seven studies were included. SNP rs11931074 showed consistent associations with PD across all models, with low heterogeneity and no evidence of publication bias. rs356219 and rs356165 were also significantly associated with PD, although regional differences contributed to heterogeneity. In contrast, rs2583988 showed marginal significance in the allelic model, which was lost after sensitivity analyses. No associations were found under dominant or recessive models for this SNP. These findings confirm rs11931074 as a robust PD risk variant and support the roles of rs356219 and rs356165 while suggesting weaker evidence for rs2583988. Large, multi-ethnic studies are warranted to elucidate underlying mechanisms and support precision medicine in PD.

Scientific assessment

01

Research question

Assess the question within the original study’s scope.

02

Methods & sample

Check the source article for study design and sample details.

03

Key findings

An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.

04

Limitations

Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.

Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.