SCIENTIFIC HUB

Follow the evidence.

SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE · MED

Risk factors of mild behavioral impairment: a systematic review.

Front Psychol · 2025-06-27

DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1586418PMID: 40657582

Open accessSystematic Review; systematic-review; Journal ArticleOriginal source ↗

Research overview

The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by

IntroductionMild Behavioral Impairment (MBI) represents a predementia syndrome marked by neuropsychiatric symptoms that may precede detectable cognitive decline. Identifying factors associated with MBI is critical for developing targeted prevention strategies in neurodegenerative disorders.MethodsThis systematic review adhered to PRISMA 2020 guidelines, searching PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, ScienceDirect, and Embase through May 2024. Forty-one human studies meeting predefined inclusion criteria were selected through dual independent screening.ResultsFive key domains emerged: (1) Genetic susceptibility (APOE ε4 allele showing strongest association), (2) Motor system pathology (particularly Parkinsonian features), (3) Multisensory deficits (auditory impairment demonstrating bidirectional relationships), (4) Metabolic dysregulation (diabetes mellitus and frailty phenotypes), and (5) Neuroanatomical correlates (frontolimbic atrophy patterns on MRI). The interaction between genetic predisposition and environmental/lifestyle factors appears central to MBI pathogenesis.ConclusionMBI manifests as a multidimensional interface between molecular mechanisms and clinical phenomenology. Our synthesis supports the implementation of transdiagnostic screening protocols integrating behavioral biomarkers with conventional cognitive assessments. Future research should prioritize longitudinal designs to establish causal pathways and intervention thresholds.

Scientific assessment

01

Research question

Assess the question within the original study’s scope.

02

Methods & sample

Check the source article for study design and sample details.

03

Key findings

An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.

04

Limitations

Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.

Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.