SCIENTIFIC HUB

Follow the evidence.

SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE · MED

Understanding the Pre-Clinical Stages of Parkinson's Disease: Where Are We in Clinical and Research Settings?

Int J Mol Sci · 2025-07-17

DOI: 10.3390/ijms26146881PMID: 40725128

Open accessreview-article; Review; Journal ArticleOriginal source ↗

Research overview

The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by

Parkinson's disease (PD) is the second most common neurodegenerative disorder in the world. PD is characterized by motor and non-motor symptoms, but the diagnosis primarily relies on the clinical assessment of postural and movement abnormalities, supported by imaging and genetic testing. It is widely accepted that the disease process begins decades before the onset of overt symptoms. Emerging evidence suggests that neuroinflammation plays a central role in the pathogenesis of PD, particularly during the pre-clinical phase. Activated microglia, increased levels of pro-inflammatory cytokines, and persistent oxidative stress have all been associated with the gradual loss of dopaminergic neurons. Although earlier detection and diagnosis remain elusive, achieving these goals is crucial for advancing prevention and disease-modifying strategies. Clinical studies are ongoing. To fill the gap, research models that recapitulate the chronic disease progression of PD are crucial to test preventive and disease-modifying strategies. This review briefly summarizes clinical knowledge on PD as a starting point for improving research models. Furthermore, we will critically evaluate how the existing models have been utilized and highlight opportunities to overcome their limitations and enhance the translational relevance to clinical application.

Scientific assessment

01

Research question

Assess the question within the original study’s scope.

02

Methods & sample

Check the source article for study design and sample details.

03

Key findings

An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.

04

Limitations

Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.

Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.