SCIENTIFIC HUB

Follow the evidence.

SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE · MED

Tremor: Clinical Frameworks, Network Dysfunction and Therapeutics.

Brain Sci · 2025-07-27

DOI: 10.3390/brainsci15080799PMID: 40867132

Open accessreview-article; Review; Journal ArticleOriginal source ↗

Research overview

The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by

Background: Tremor is a common but diagnostically challenging movement disorder due to its clinical heterogeneity and overlapping aetiologies. The 2018 consensus introduced a two-axis classification system that redefined tremor syndromes by distinguishing between clinical phenomenology and underlying causes, and introduced new diagnostic categories, such as essential tremor plus. Methods: This review synthesises recent advances in the epidemiology, classification, pathophysiology, and treatment of tremor syndromes, aiming to provide an integrated and clinically relevant framework that aligns with emerging diagnostic and therapeutic paradigms. Results: We discuss how electrophysiology, neuroimaging, wearable sensors, and artificial intelligence are reshaping diagnostic precision. Syndromes such as essential tremor, parkinsonian tremor, dystonic tremor, task-specific tremor, orthostatic tremor, and functional tremor are examined through syndromic, aetiological, and mechanistic lenses. The limitations of current rating scales and the promise of emerging biomarkers are critically assessed. Conclusions: As therapeutic approaches evolve toward neuromodulation and precision medicine, the need for pathophysiologically grounded diagnostic criteria becomes more urgent. Integrating network-based frameworks, digital diagnostics, and individualised treatment holds promise for advancing tremor care.

Scientific assessment

01

Research question

Assess the question within the original study’s scope.

02

Methods & sample

Check the source article for study design and sample details.

03

Key findings

An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.

04

Limitations

Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.

Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.