SCIENTIFIC HUB

Follow the evidence.

SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE · MED

Removal of Toxic Metabolites-Chelation: Manganese Disorders.

J Inherit Metab Dis · 2025-11-01

DOI: 10.1002/jimd.70107PMID: 41177175

Open accessreview-article; Review; Journal ArticleOriginal source ↗

Research overview

The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by

Manganese (Mn) overload is a characteristic of multiple disease entities, from acquired manganism upon environmental or occupational overexposure, to end-stage liver disease and certain genetic disorders. The latter include hypermanganesaemia with dystonia 1 and 2 caused by pathogenic variants in the genes encoding the Mn transporters SLC30A10 and SLC39A14. Excess Mn accumulates in the brain, particularly in the globus pallidus, leading to progressive dystonia-parkinsonism. Furthermore, Mn dyshomeostasis is a characteristic feature of common neurodegenerative disorders such as Parkinson's disease, whether as a cause or consequence needs to be determined, suggesting that Mn as an environmental toxicant may play a role in its aetiology. Therefore, there is a need for therapeutics that effectively chelate Mn and remove excess Mn from the brain. This review discusses the Mn chelators currently used in clinical practice, their advantages and disadvantages as well as their adverse effects. Na2CaEDTA is the primary chelating agent used to re-establish Mn homeostasis; however, its burdensome treatment regimen, need for intravenous administration, and lack of metal specificity make it a poor drug for clinical application. The development of novel, Mn-specific chelating agents is therefore a clinical priority. An ideal chelator would be orally bioavailable, soluble in both lipids and water to reach the sites of metal storage, chemically inert, and non-toxic whilst retaining chelating abilities at physiological pH. We discuss current progress in identifying novel Mn ligands that have been primarily developed as magnetic resonance imaging contrast agents.

Scientific assessment

01

Research question

Assess the question within the original study’s scope.

02

Methods & sample

Check the source article for study design and sample details.

03

Key findings

An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.

04

Limitations

Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.

Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.