Research overview
The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by
ObjectiveTo examine the predictive validity of field-based muscular strength tests in relation to incident long-term health conditions among adults.DesignSystematic review and meta-analysis.Data sourcesPubMed, Web of Science, SPORTDiscus, Scopus, CINAHL, Epistemonikos and Google Scholar.Eligibility criteriaCohort studies examining the predictive value of validated and/or reliable field-based muscular strength tests in relation to long-term health conditions in adults aged ≥18 years.ResultsA total of 155 studies were included with 94 included in the meta-analysis. Adults with the highest (vs lowest) handgrip strength levels had a lower risk of multiple long-term health conditions (all pConclusionsOur findings suggest increased handgrip strength and chair-stand test performance are associated with a lower risk of multiple long-term health conditions among adults. This research underscores the predictive value of simple field-based muscular strength tests which appear to be clinically useful for adults across different age groups and demographic profiles.
Scientific assessment
Research question
Assess the question within the original study’s scope.
Methods & sample
Check the source article for study design and sample details.
Key findings
An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.
Limitations
Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.
Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.