SCIENTIFIC HUB

Follow the evidence.

SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE · MED

BDNF and GDNF in Parkinson's Disease: Associations with Clinical Features, Disease Course, and Progression-A Systematic Review.

Mol Neurobiol · 2026-02-16

DOI: 10.1007/s12035-025-05649-zPMID: 41697575

Open accessSystematic Review; review-article; Journal ArticleOriginal source ↗

Research overview

The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by

Glial cell line-derived neurotrophic factor (GDNF) and brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) are proteins essential for neuronal survival and implicated in Parkinson's disease (PD) pathophysiology. Although reduced levels of these neurotrophins have been observed in PD, their relationship with disease progression remains unclear. We conducted a systematic review by independently searching four databases using predefined keywords: Parkinson AND (GDNF OR BDNF OR neurotroph) AND (serum OR blood OR cerebrospinal fluid). After screening 2132 records, 35 studies qualified for inclusion. Changes in neurotrophic factors' levels were evaluated in relation to disease severity and duration. Many studies reported a decline in BDNF levels associated with more severe motor symptoms. Some studies noted increased BDNF levels in advanced PD. This pattern may be affected by levodopa treatment, suggesting that elevated BDNF levels in advanced PD could reflect a treatment-related effect rather than disease progression itself. Reduced levels of both GDNF and BDNF were linked to cognitive decline, with BDNF also decreased in PD patients with depression. Serum BDNF levels were associated with motor severity and neuropsychiatric symptoms. BDNF levels in PD may increase with longer disease duration, likely due to levodopa treatment effects. However, lower BDNF levels are seen in cognitive decline and depression, frequent non-motor symptoms of PD. Further research is required to clarify BDNF dynamics and to determine GDNF's role in motor progression and cognitive decline.

Scientific assessment

01

Research question

Assess the question within the original study’s scope.

02

Methods & sample

Check the source article for study design and sample details.

03

Key findings

An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.

04

Limitations

Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.

Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.