Research overview
The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by
Diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) is a valuable method for evaluating microstructural changes in the amygdala associated with neurodegenerative and neuroinflammatory disorders. This systematic review examines amygdala microstructural alterations in Alzheimer's disease (AD), Parkinson's disease (PD), amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB), and multiple sclerosis (MS) using DTI metrics. Following PRISMA 2020 guidelines, we searched PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science databases through August 2025, identifying 4,442 records. After screening and eligibility assessment, 13 studies were included, comprising 1,412 patients and 1,146 healthy controls. Due to sample heterogeneity and lack of standardized effect size measures, meta-analysis was not performed. Across disorders, elevated mean diffusivity (MD) emerged as the most consistent finding, present in 100 % of AD patients and observed in all examined conditions. Reduced fractional anisotropy (FA) was the second most frequent alteration, with 36.6 % of AD patients showing decreased FA. In MS, increased radial diffusivity (RD) was prominent, while longitudinal DLB studies revealed progressive free water (FW) increases. These DTI-based microstructural changes often preceded volumetric atrophy and correlated with clinical severity. Our findings demonstrate that DTI metrics, particularly MD and FA, serve as sensitive markers of amygdala pathology across neurodegenerative diseases and may facilitate early diagnosis, disease monitoring, and differential diagnosis of these conditions.
Scientific assessment
Research question
Assess the question within the original study’s scope.
Methods & sample
Check the source article for study design and sample details.
Key findings
An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.
Limitations
Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.
Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.