SCIENTIFIC HUB

Follow the evidence.

SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE · MED

Molecular Mechanisms and Clinical Applications of Neural Regeneration Through Dental Pulp Stem Cells.

Stem Cells Int · 2026-04-08

DOI: 10.1155/sci/8069882PMID: 41959929

Open accessreview-article; Review; Journal ArticleOriginal source ↗

Research overview

The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by

Neural injuries affecting both the central nervous system (CNS) and peripheral nervous system (PNS) pose a great clinical challenge due to the neural tissue's limited self-regenerative capacity. Human dental pulp stem cells (hDPSCs), derived from the neural crest and easily obtained from extracted teeth, exhibit considerable potential for neural regeneration. This potential is attributed to their ability to directly differentiate into various neuronal cell types, paracrine effects, and interactions with biomaterial scaffolds. In this review, we reviewed the molecular mechanisms by which hDPSCs support neural repair, highlighting their direct neuronal differentiation function, neuroprotection function via paracrine signaling, and recent innovations in biomaterial scaffolds that enhance the viability of hDPSCs for neuroregenerative applications. Preclinical studies have shown promising therapeutic effects of hDPSCs in spinal cord injuries (SCI), strokes, Parkinson's disease (PD), Alzheimer's disease (AD), and peripheral nerve injuries. However, challenges remain, including optimizing neuronal differentiation specificity, ensuring immunological safety, and achieving scalable clinical applications. Future research should focus on standardizing manufacturing protocols, implementing strict quality control, and developing functional assays linked to neural recovery to maximize the potential of hDPSCs for nervous system regeneration.

Scientific assessment

01

Research question

Assess the question within the original study’s scope.

02

Methods & sample

Check the source article for study design and sample details.

03

Key findings

An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.

04

Limitations

Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.

Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.