SCIENTIFIC HUB

Follow the evidence.

SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE · MED

Magnetic resonance imaging volumetry in atypical parkinsonism: current evidence and neuroradiological perspectives.

Front Aging Neurosci · 2026-04-21

DOI: 10.3389/fnagi.2026.1816084PMID: 42095060

Open accessreview-article; Review; Journal ArticleOriginal source ↗

Research overview

The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by

Atypical parkinsonism, including progressive supranuclear palsy (PSP), multiple system atrophy (MSA), and corticobasal syndrome (CBS), represents a major diagnostic challenge, particularly in the early stages of disease. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) plays a pivotal role in the differential diagnosis of these disorders. Beyond conventional qualitative assessment, quantitative MRI techniques, especially volumetry and planimetry, have gained increasing importance as objective tools for evaluating disease specific patterns of brain atrophy. This narrative review summarizes current evidence on MRI-based morphometric approaches in atypical parkinsonism, with a particular focus on brainstem, basal ganglia, cerebellar, and cortical measurements. The diagnostic value of established indices, including the Magnetic Resonance Parkinsonism Index (MRPI) and its updated version, MRPI 2.0, is discussed, along with advances in automated segmentation and machine learning based approaches. The potential role of MRI volumetry as both a diagnostic and progression biomarker is highlighted, together with current limitations and future perspectives relevant to neuroradiological practice.

Scientific assessment

01

Research question

Assess the question within the original study’s scope.

02

Methods & sample

Check the source article for study design and sample details.

03

Key findings

An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.

04

Limitations

Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.

Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.