NeuralCipher Research overview
The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by
Neuronal activity and cerebral blood flow are tightly coupled to support the high metabolic demands of the brain. Disruption of neurovascular coupling is a defining feature of many neurodegenerative disorders such as Alzheimer's disease, stroke, small vessel disease, Parkinson's disease, and aging. Progress in understanding the mechanisms underlying neurovascular coupling requires experimental approaches that can simultaneously measure neuronal activity and vascular dynamics with high spatial and temporal resolution, while also enabling targeted perturbations of the system. Here, we present a methodological framework that combines chronic electrophysiological recordings with two-photon imaging of cerebral blood flow and optogenetic manipulation of the vasculature in vivo. Using a chronically implanted flexible electrode array, we obtain measurements of the single- and multi-unit spiking activity, as well as local field potentials. Concurrently, two-photon microscopy enables high-resolution measurements of vessel diameter and blood flow within individual vascular segments. In addition, optogenetic control of vascular smooth muscle cells allows for rapid and reversible manipulation of the vessel diameter through the same cranial window while simultaneously recording the neural and vascular activity. We provide detailed protocols for surgical implantation, data acquisition, and analysis, and discuss experimental considerations and limitations. This combined platform offers a powerful tool for mechanistic studies of neurovascular coupling and its dysfunction in disease models.
Scientific assessment
Research question
Assess the question within the original study’s scope.
Methods & sample
Check the source article for study design and sample details.
Key findings
An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.
Limitations
Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.
Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.