SCIENTIFIC HUB

Follow the evidence.

SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE · MED

Vitamin D Signaling in Neurodegenerative Disorders: Mechanisms, Therapeutic Potential, and Clinical Implications.

Nutrients · 2026-06-25

DOI: 10.3390/nu18132082PMID: 42451086

Open accessreview-article; Review; Journal ArticleOriginal source ↗

Research overview

The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by

Vitamin D has long been recognized for its role in calcium homeostasis and bone metabolism; however, it is now emerging as an important regulator of central nervous system (CNS) function. Recent evidence suggests that vitamin D signaling contributes to the pathogenesis and progression of several neurodegenerative disorders. Vitamin D exerts neuroprotective effects through multiple mechanisms, including regulation of calcium homeostasis, modulation of immune responses, reduction in oxidative stress, stimulation of neurotrophic factors, and maintenance of blood-brain barrier (BBB) integrity. Vitamin D receptors and metabolizing enzymes are widely distributed across several brain regions, highlighting their direct involvement in neuronal function. This review summarizes the biosynthesis, metabolism, and signaling pathways of vitamin D. It explores its role in neurodegenerative diseases such as Alzheimer's disease (AD), Parkinson's disease (PD), multiple sclerosis (MS), amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), stroke, and traumatic brain injury (TBI). Evidence from experimental and clinical studies indicates that vitamin D deficiency is associated with an increased risk and severity of these conditions, while supplementation may provide therapeutic benefits.

Scientific assessment

01

Research question

Assess the question within the original study’s scope.

02

Methods & sample

Check the source article for study design and sample details.

03

Key findings

An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.

04

Limitations

Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.

Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.