Research overview
The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by
BackgroundOrthostatic tremor (OT) is traditionally classified using tremor frequency and the presence of associated neurological signs. However, increasing reports of overlapping frequencies, fluctuating electrophysiological profiles, and diverse clinical associations indicate that current classification systems may not fully capture the clinical heterogeneity of OT.MethodsA systematic review of PubMed/MEDLINE from inception to February 2026 identified case reports, case series, and original studies reporting electromyography-confirmed OT with individual patient data. Demographic, clinical, electrophysiological, and data on associated conditions were extracted. Cases were classified according to the 2018 Movement Disorder Society criteria and separately grouped as isolated or non-isolated OT. Associations between tremor frequency and clinical phenotype were assessed using receiver operating characteristic analysis and multivariable logistic regression.ResultsOne hundred studies comprising 244 patients were included. Mean tremor frequency was 13.32 ± 4.15 Hz (range 3-20 Hz). Seventeen patients (6.97%) could not be classified using current criteria because of frequencies exceeding 18 Hz or fluctuations across the 13-Hz threshold. Non-isolated OT had significantly lower tremor frequencies than isolated OT (11.03 Hz vs 14.80 Hz, p DiscussionMost cases were classifiable using the current OT criteria. However, a small subset demonstrated boundary-spanning or out-of-range frequencies. These findings suggest that tremor frequency remains an important electrophysiological feature of OT but should be interpreted alongside the clinical context.HighlightsElectromyography-confirmed orthostatic tremor exhibited marked clinical and electrophysiological heterogeneity across neurological and non-neurological conditions. Most cases were classifiable using the current OT criteria. However, a small subset demonstrated boundary-spanning or out-of-range frequencies. These findings suggest that tremor frequency remains an important electrophysiological feature of OT but should be interpreted alongside the clinical context.
Scientific assessment
Research question
Assess the question within the original study’s scope.
Methods & sample
Check the source article for study design and sample details.
Key findings
An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.
Limitations
Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.
Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.