Research overview
The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by
Introduction Bipolar disorder (BD) is considered a risk factor for developing Parkinson’s Disease (PD) because of an altered dopamine activity in both entities. Comorbidity may delay diagnosis and difficult therapeutic management. Objectives To describe the case of a patient with both BD and PD and to determine the appropriate diagnostic and therapeutic approach for patients presenting both entities. Methods We present the case of a 58-year-old woman attended in our neurology unit due to the initial presence of visual hallucinations as a core symptom. Results Psychotic symptoms as hallucinations and off-times, frequently observed in PD, may be misdiagnosed with a worsening of depressive polarity of BD. Thus, overlap between symptoms may lead to a challenging differential diagnosis. Moreover, there is no consensus about the therapeutic management of the comorbidity, due to the bidirectional worsening of symptoms when treatment is adjusted. In our case, a diagnosis of dopaminergic psychosis was made so antipsychotic treatment with quetiapine 50 mg/d was initiated. A worsening of symptoms was observed, presenting the patient a stuporous status, mutism and generalized rigidity. Neuroimaging and lumbar puncture were performed showing no alterations; electroencephalogram showed diffuse slowing. Final diagnosis was an off-episode of PD and a multifactorial encephalopathy resulting in visual hallucinations. Conclusions Coexistence of PD and BD may lead to a diagnostic and therapeutic delay and therefore a worse prognosis. Although these diseases are well-known, it is still challenging to manage patients presenting both entities. Further research is needed to clarify the proper diagnostic and therapeutic approach for these patients. Disclosure No significant relationships.
Scientific assessment
Research question
Assess the question within the original study’s scope.
Methods & sample
Check the source article for study design and sample details.
Key findings
An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.
Limitations
Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.
Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.