SCIENTIFIC HUB

Follow the evidence.

SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE · PPR

Effectiveness of Wearable Sensors in Managing Chronic Diseases: A Review

· 2025-04-28

DOI: 10.20944/preprints202504.2283.v1

Check source for accessPreprintOriginal source ↗

Research overview

The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by

Wearable sensors have emerged as pivotal tools in the management of chronic diseases, including cardiovascular diseases, Parkinson’s disease, diabetes, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), and arthritis. We aim to investigate the contribution of wearable sensors in managing chronic diseases and remote patient monitoring by evaluating the existing literature which involves types, applications, and impacts of wearable sensors on chronic disease management and treatment planning. This review systematically evaluates the existing literature published in reputable conferences and journals from 2015 to 2024. The databases used for this literature review include Google Scholar, Sci-Hub, and IEEE Xplore. The analysis categorizes the literature based on the types of wearable sensors, their applications, and their impacts on the management of chronic diseases. The findings indicate that wearable technology is particularly beneficial for chronic diseases that require continuous monitoring of health parameters. For example, diabetes management greatly benefits from real-time blood glucose monitoring, while cardiovascular diseases require ongoing heart rate monitoring. In contrast, the efficacy of wearable technology appears limited in addressing mental health conditions such as anxiety and depression. Wearable devices facilitate predic-tive analytics and treatment planning through real-time data monitoring. To enhance the effectiveness of wearable technology, future designs should prioritize user privacy and comfort alongside technical performance. This review advocates for future research aimed at improving the accuracy, privacy, and efficiency of wearable sensors through their integration with existing healthcare systems.

Scientific assessment

01

Research question

Assess the question within the original study’s scope.

02

Methods & sample

Check the source article for study design and sample details.

03

Key findings

An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.

04

Limitations

Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.

Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.