SCIENTIFIC HUB

Follow the evidence.

SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE · PPR

Clinical Correlates of Cognitive Impairment in Progressive Supranuclear Palsy and Multiple System Atrophy: A Comparative Neuropsychological Study

· 2026-07-15

DOI: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-10275015/v1

Check source for accessPreprintOriginal source ↗

Research overview

The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by

Abstract Background Atypical Parkinsonian Syndromes (AP), such as Progressive Supranuclear Palsy (PSP), Multiple System atrophy (MSA), are characterized by motor and non-motor symptoms. Although cognitive impairment is a core feature of AP, its differential profile across AP syndromes has been inadequately understood, particularly in underrepresented populations like in India. Aim To compare cognitive and neuropsychological profiles in PSP and MSA and examine their clinical correlates. Methods In this cross-sectional study, AP patients underwent cognitive assessment using the Frontal Assessment Battery (FAB), the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA), the Addenbrooke’s Cognitive Examination-III (ACE-III), and selected neuropsychological tests from the NIMHANS Neuropsychology Battery for the elderly (NNBE). Between-group comparisons were conducted using age-adjusted ANCOVA. Partial correlations examined associations between cognition and clinical variables within each group. Results A total of 159 patients were included in which PSP (n = 98, mean age 62.5 ± 7.4 years) was older than MSA (n = 61, 58.6 ± 7.8 years). Groups were gender-matched (p = 0.48). After age adjustment and FDR correction, PSP showed significantly lower scores than MSA on FAB, MoCA, and ACE-III Total, as well as on fluency, attention, visuospatial construction, and visuospatial working memory measures (all corrected p 

Scientific assessment

01

Research question

Assess the question within the original study’s scope.

02

Methods & sample

Check the source article for study design and sample details.

03

Key findings

An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.

04

Limitations

Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.

Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.