Research overview
The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by
BackgroundHyperhomocysteinemia is considered an independent risk factor for cognitive impairment.ObjectiveTo study the correlation between homocysteine levels and cognitive impairment in patients with PD.MethodsWe conducted a case-control study that included 246 patients with PD, of whom 32 were cognitively impaired. The levels of homocysteine, folate, and vitamin B12 were measured in peripheral blood. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was applied to determine differences in homocysteine levels between PD patients with and without cognitive impairment. A meta-analysis was performed to clarify the role of Hcy levels in PD with cognitive decline. Five polymorphisms in genes involved in Hcy metabolism, including MTHFR rs1801133 and rs1801131, COMT rs4680, MTRR rs1801394, and TCN2 rs1801198, were genotyped.ResultsOur case-control study showed that homocysteine levels were associated with cognitive impairment in PD after adjusting for possible confounding factors such as levodopa equivalent daily dose. The results of our meta-analysis further supported the positive association between homocysteine levels and cognition in PD. We found that the MTHFR rs1801133 TT genotype led to higher homocysteine levels in PD patients, whereas the MTHFR rs1801131 CC genotype resulted in higher folate levels. However, the polymorphisms studied were not associated with cognitive impairment in PD.ConclusionsIncreased homocysteine levels were a risk factor for cognitive decline in PD. However, no association was found between polymorphisms in genes involved in homocysteine metabolism and cognitive impairment in PD. Large-scale studies of ethnically diverse populations are required to definitively assess the relationship between MTHFR and cognitive impairment in PD.
Scientific assessment
Research question
Assess the question within the original study’s scope.
Methods & sample
Check the source article for study design and sample details.
Key findings
An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.
Limitations
Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.
Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.