Research overview
The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by
Alpha-synuclein has been associated with neurodegeneration, especially in Parkinson's disease (PD). This study aimed to review clinical, biochemical, and neuroimaging markers and management of prodromal synucleinopathies. The prodromal state of synucleinopathies can be better understood with PD pathophysiology, and it can be separated into premotor and pre-diagnostic phases. The incidence of PD in patients with prodromal phase symptoms ranges from 0.07 to 14.30, and the most frequently studied pathology is the REM behavioral disorder (RBD). Neuroimaging markers are related to dopamine denervation, brain perfusion changes, gross anatomy changes, and peripheral abnormalities. α-synuclein assays (SAA) in CSF revealed high sensitivity (up to 97%) and high specificity (up to 92%); in the last decade, there was the development of other matrices (blood, skin, and olfactory mucosa) for obtaining quantitative and qualitative α-synuclein. Other biomarkers are neurofilament light chain, DOPA decarboxylase, and multiplexed mass spectrometry assay. Regarding genetic counseling in α-synucleinopathies, it is an important topic in clinical practice to discuss with patients with high-risk individuals and should involve basic principles of autonomy, beneficence, and non-maleficence. Some of the themes that should be reviewed are the involvement of physical activity, diet (including alcohol, coffee, and vitamin supplementation), smoking, sleep, and stress in the pathophysiology of synucleinopathies. The number of trials related to prodromal symptoms is still scarce, and the number of studies evaluating intervention is even lower.
Scientific assessment
Research question
Assess the question within the original study’s scope.
Methods & sample
Check the source article for study design and sample details.
Key findings
An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.
Limitations
Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.
Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.