SCIENTIFIC HUB

Follow the evidence.

SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE · MED

Impulse control disorders and dopamine receptor agonism in Parkinson's disease patients: Clinical implications.

Parkinsonism Relat Disord · 2025-12-09

DOI: 10.1016/j.parkreldis.2025.108147PMID: 41387037

Check source for accessReview; Journal ArticleOriginal source ↗

Research overview

The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by

The association between impulse control disorders (ICDs) and dopamine agonist (DA) treatment in Parkinson's disease (PD) has been well known and extensively researched since the early 2000s. The most common behaviors included in ICDs are compulsive shopping, pathological gambling and hypersexuality which confer substantial burdens to patients and families. DAs show a more stable effect on motor control and confer lower risk of dyskinesia than levodopa, however due to the burden of ICDs, DAs in PD treatment are approached with increasing caution. Mechanisms and risk factors for ICD development in PD patients treated with DAs have been linked to D3 receptor agonism, premorbid traits and genetic predispositions. In this review we sought to examine the relevance of the degree of dopamine receptor subtype selectivity and risk of ICD, and implications for clinical practice. In line with current views, we found D3 receptor agonism to be more consistently associated with increased ICD risk compared to agents with wider receptor agonism profiles. However, this may also be explained by the difference in extended release (ER) and immediate release (IR) formulations. These findings provide the possibility that both ER formulations and agonists with wider dopamine receptor profiles may be preferred in order to reduce ICD risk in DA therapy. However, DAs confer significantly increased risk nonetheless, and as such it may be advisable to limit the use of these DAs to clinical contexts in which their administration is strongly indicated.

Scientific assessment

01

Research question

Assess the question within the original study’s scope.

02

Methods & sample

Check the source article for study design and sample details.

03

Key findings

An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.

04

Limitations

Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.

Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.