SCIENTIFIC HUB

Follow the evidence.

SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE · PPR

Clinical and imaging characteristics of Parkinson’s disease with negative alpha-synuclein seed amplification assay

· 2025-10-03

DOI: 10.1101/2025.10.01.25337085

Check source for accessPreprintOriginal source ↗

Research overview

The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by

Background The CSF alpha-synuclein seed amplification assay (CSFasynSAA) detects alpha-synuclein aggregation in over 90% of individuals with sporadic PD (sPD). However, the clinical characteristics of sPD with negative CSFasynSAA remain undefined. Objectives Describe clinical and neuroimaging characteristics of CSFasynSAA negative sPD individuals in the Parkinson’s Progression Markers Initiative (PPMI). Methods We identified sPD PPMI participants with a negative CSFasynSAA (SAA negative, n=80) or positive CSFasynSAA (SAA positive, n=856) result at baseline. For comparative analysis between groups we used a reduced dataset (n=79 SAA negative and n=237 SAA positive) propensity-score matched on age, sex, and time since clinical diagnosis. Clinical parameters, DAT-SPECT, and MRI brain volumetrics were analyzed. Results The SAA negative and matched SAA positive groups had similar motor performance on the MDS-UPDRS-part III and similar cognitive performance on the MoCA at baseline. The proportion with severe hyposmia was 12% for SAA negative versus 73% for SAA positive ( p Conclusions At baseline, SAA negative sPD PPMI participants have a substantially lower rate of hyposmia, but otherwise cannot be readily distinguished from SAA positive participants based on clinical characteristics. However, SAA negative participants have a greater degree of subcortical brain atrophy, and approximately 1 out of 6 SAA negative participants received a change in diagnosis.

Scientific assessment

01

Research question

Assess the question within the original study’s scope.

02

Methods & sample

Check the source article for study design and sample details.

03

Key findings

An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.

04

Limitations

Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.

Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.