SCIENTIFIC HUB

Follow the evidence.

SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE · PPR

Comparative Evaluation of Standardized Imaging-Guided Contact Selection for Subthalamic Deep Brain Stimulation in Parkinson's Disease: Study Protocol for a Randomized Double-blind Crossover Trial

· 2025-07-08

DOI: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-6542345/v1

Check source for accessPreprintOriginal source ↗

Research overview

The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by

Abstract Background : Subthalamic deep brain stimulation (STN-DBS) effectively treats motor symptoms in Parkinson's disease, but individual responses vary. Despite modern directional leads allowing more precise stimulation, optimal contact selection strategies remain undefined. This study compares a standardized imaging-guided contact selection protocol to conventional clinical programming. Methods : We designed a monocentric, randomized, double-blind crossover trial enrolling 30 people with Parkinson's Disease with bilateral directional STN-DBS. Participants will receive both programming approaches: standardized imaging-guided contact selection targeting the dorsolateral STN and conventional contact selection through clinical test stimulations. Each configuration will be applied for one week. The primary outcome is patient preference after both treatments. Secondary outcomes include motor assessments, accelerometric monitoring and questionnaire-based quality of life measures. Discussion : This study addresses a critical gap in standardization of imaging-guided DBS programming. By using patient preference as the primary outcome, we aim to capture clinically meaningful differences that may not be detected with traditional motor scales. The crossover design balances statistical power with clinical feasibility in specialized care settings. Trial Registration : Deutsches Register für Klinische Studien (DRKS00034229, May 27th, 2024)

Scientific assessment

01

Research question

Assess the question within the original study’s scope.

02

Methods & sample

Check the source article for study design and sample details.

03

Key findings

An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.

04

Limitations

Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.

Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.